In my opinion, it is not ethical for a CPA or CPA squiffy to help companies manage their reported earnings and financial condition. The framework of estimable Reasoning comprises five parts: Opinion, self-interest, consequence, duty, and character. This framework can help us better analyze this matter.
First, opinion puts self-interest p benthesis to see into this matter. If a CPA or CPA tight first serves as a consultant then as the given entitys auditor, it is auditing its own work. In that way, nobody else is really going to check whether a certain accounting intercession is compliant with GAAP. Different opinion resulted from different understanding more or less an issue would not be raised. Moreover, generally speaking, human beings are reluctantly to admit their mistakes. The CPA or CPA firm would at least have reputational interest in the financial report that it managed. This human nature will impair the CPA or CPA firms independence, and will minify the reliability of the audit report.
Second, self-interest focuses on the interest of ending makers. The CPA or the individual partner of the CPA firm would probably increase his own compensation by serving as both the entitys consultant and auditor. On the otherwise side, for the entity, hiring the same firm as both consultant and auditor can save it audit expense, since the CPA or CPA firm has already known a lot well-nigh it when realizeing consulting, thus decreasing its audit hours. For example, in the case, subsequently receiving the copy of SAS No.50 report, E&Y did not perform any meaningful separate analysis in decision making that the SPE accounting treatment of PNC was acceptable.
Third, consequences focus on the interest...If you want to father a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment