See Below

Supremacy of EC LawBosnitania , a federal state and appendage state of the EU did not implement an EC guiding and public convenience Co , which belonged to that country , faces imminent bankruptcy cod to this omission . Bosnitania s regional assemblies also failed to implement the directional and to chemical compound the felony , its Supreme judicatory govern that discipline honor had antecedency over the DirectiveThe isms of direct effect and supremacy of EC police over national virtue have become tendinous mechanisms for respective(prenominal)s to invite the ECJ to intervene in the national policy making procedures . Moreover , the national courts have to discard laws and policies that contravene the EC law . The school of thought of direct effect strengthens EC law and the ECJ established it in its chance law , which maintains that the Treaty of capital of Italy had bestowed certain individual rights on the citizens of Europe and the national courts were needful to protect them . A very importantprinciple developed by the ECJ is the doctrine of supremacy of EC law over national laws . The advance ruling system of the Union was drastically changed by this doctrine . Previous to the supremacy doctrine , national courts could seek the version of the ECJ in conflicts but there was sea change with the victimization of this doctrine , because individuals can challenge the compatibility of national law with EC lawIn rib v Enel , the ECJ established the doctrine of the supremacy of EC law over national law . The EC law became to a greater extent effective with the concepts of direct effect and supremacy of EC law , thereby making the national law more compatible with the EC law .

In Van Gend en Loos case the ECJ established the doctrine of direct effect and ruled that treaty enforced individual rights had to be protected by the national courts This empowers European citizens to compel their governments to respect treaty obligationsIn the Francovich case it was decided that if a directive has not been transposed into national law then an individual can seek honorarium from that member state . Compensation can be claimed if the directive bestows rights on individuals and if there is a relationship between the individual s loss and failure to transpose the directive . Therefore public lavatory Co can claim compensation from the Bosnitanian authorities for the losses incurred by it due to non transposition of the directive Since the Supreme Court has made the directive subservient to national law , Widget Co has to approach the ECJ for redressal BibliographyC - 26 /62 , N . V . Algemene Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend Loos v Nederlandse administratie der belastingen (1963C - 6 /64 , Flamino Costa v ENEL (1964 ) ECRC-9 /90 Francovich and Others [1991] ECR I-5357Direct Effect , In encyclopaedia of the European Union , 2000 , October 16 2007 , HYPERLINK hypertext transfer protocol /www .credoreference .com / ingress /864447 http /www .credoreference .com /entry /864447European Court of Justice (ECJ , In Encyclopedia of the European Union 2000 , October 16 , 2007 , HYPERLINK http /www .credoreference .com /entry /864566 http /www .credoreference .com /entry /864566 .European...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .