Upon investigation, it was discovered that back in 1978 speculative repairs had been made in Osaka by Boeing engineers. The plane's tail section had moved(p) the tarmac in a heavy landing, causing constitute to the tail. The fuselage plate did not extend across the full station of the damage, leaving a single line of rivets to carry the subvert of three lines. Boeing's fuselage repair specifications reveal that a single speech of rivets is insufficient to hold the panel in place (Lisk 1). Questions have been raised as to the reasons for the trouble of Boeing's repair-work inspection procedures, a failure in the quality control of engineering which ultimately cost 520 families dearly.
Boeing settled 377 of the lawsuits filed by victims' families out of court.
Japan Airlines accepted a ruling of contributing negligence for failing to address describe whistling noises which had been heard intermittently from the fuselage for some years precedent to the catastrophic structural failure (Wikipedia 1).
Photograph illustrating the missing tail-fin.
An unknown amateur photographer took an grasp (endnote) at some stage after the tail-fin sheared away. In 1995, debris from the airliner was found in Sagami Bay, located approximately xii minutes along the JAL 123 flight path. Tail fin sections, disgrace rudder, rear fuselage panels and power unit ducting were located, conclusively confirming the lay at which the stabilizing fin had detached (Lisk 1) and exonerating the crew of pilot error.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment