New York: Vintage

In the twentieth cytosine, a less confident West has been much readier to see score as a series of accidents, and to question the very view of historical objectivity. Even "the facts" are not objective, since which facts are presented is a matter of selection.

Carr rejects both the simple determinism of historical writing in the nineteenth century and what may be called the "accidentalism" of the twentieth. "History," he writes, "is touch with the relation between the unique and the general" (p. 83). What we call accidents in history were as much a part of a chain of causation as anything else; they are accidental just in the sense that they give us less guidance. He offers the analogy of a man who goes out to buy cigarets and is killed by a drunk driver. The victim's decision to go out for cigarets could be called the "cause" of the accident, scarcely that does not help us make out traffic deaths, whereas focusing on drunk drivers does.

Carr then extends this business about historical writing into an argument about the constitution of history in the sense of actual events or trends. In so doing, he argues for what may be called a limited doctrine of progress, (suggesting that the modern sense of stagnation or adjust is mere Western parochialism). It is not progress in the "Whig reading material" or Hegelian sense, toward some pre-ordained goal, but a gradual enlargement of the localise of hu

Craniometry last fell out of favor, and by the early twentieth century its place was taken by intelligence tests. The tests, however, were often distressingly culture-bound. One test required testees to fill in missing parts of a picture. "A Sicilian [Army] recruit ... added a crucifix where it had always appeared in his native land to a house without a chimney. He was marked wrong" (p. 200).

A low point in the history of IQ interrogation was established by Sir Cyril Burt, whose studies of identical twins, supposedly demonstrating the dominant share of heredity in intelligence, were eventually found to be altogether fraudulent (pp. 235-36).

In Gould's view, however, Burt committed a conceptual illusion that would have rendered his results largely irrelevent even if they had been valid: the conclusion that thither is some single measurable quantity of "intelligence." Gould devotes considerable worry to the mechanics by which scores on a range of mental tests were cor tie in to derive a single value, and to lit crit of the application of this methodology.

A striking exception is Islam. "Of all the world's sacred traditions the Islamic would seem to be the one with a entire name" (p. 80). This, Smith suggests, is not a peculiarity of Islam, but simply puts Islam at one end of a continuum, and he suggests that it can be traced to a long development in the Middle East, by which distinctive religious communities, set by by their doctrines, had gradually come into being. It was against this background that Islam appeared, and thus outlined itself by name from the first.

On another but related level, sociology delves even deeper than economics into the laws of unintended consequences. Max Weber's theory relating capitalism to the "Protestant ethic" was frequently misunderstood by critics who protested that Calvin and Luther did not have capitalism in mind. The sociologist answers that capitalism was an unintended, not intended, byproduct of their theolo
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.