Immigration Policy In The U.s. (1900`s)

: Immigration Policy in the U .S (1900`s IntroductionThis asserts that the unite States like any different evolving society , tried implementing strategies for genial grammatical construction of race by denying naturalisation as a mode of conferring citizenship against non-whites as reflected in the cases of Ozawa and Thind , from the late 1800 s to early 1990 s . This and asserts that such actions by the US government in its naturalization of non-Americans were also felt in its immigration policy for the aforesaid(prenominal) era but sealed points has come where US has to characterise its citizenship policy as may be influences by its request as society of people that evolves over fourth dimensionA social construction of race is a social phenomenonSocial construction of race may be defined to be a natural phenomenon that is adoptive by a certain group of people to nurse and preserve their kind as what happened in the case of the US . The Americans did apply this social concept in discriminating against other races as far as bestowing citizenship is concerned . The Ozawa and Thind cases are the storied jurisprudential rulings that could recalled during the period late 1800 s to early 1900 s of American biography as a nation . In the case of Ozawa , the US Supreme Court first tried to define the implication of white persons some time in the early 1920 s 1922 , the approachyard denied naturalization to Takao Ozawa . Naturalization is legal process of conferring citizenship to a non-American for purposes of bestowing rights enjoyed by citizens like the right to vote and be voted upon into office . Ozawa was Nipponese born in Japan and although the applicant has the serve the US military for at least six months at the time of application , the courts denied the application on the grounds that he was not a white person (Lopez , 1997 .

The court in limiting citizenship to white persons state that only those that are popularly cognise as the Caucasian race can become US citizens at that time (Jacobsen ,1998 ) This ruling of the court was to commented to contradict to the ethnologic argument that there are those races who were not white of flake , but who were classified as Caucasian by ethnologists on grounds of common ancestry . In this case , the court took part in reinforcing the social phenomenon of preserving a distinct sign of a group (Lopez , 1997In the case of Thind , the Supreme Court subtle its reasoning and rejected scientific definition by ethnological classification for one to be considered a part of certain race in 1923 . Thind was Hindu of full Indian crease and who was born in Punjab and the court used the same detail to deny the person eligibility to naturalization . The court in its intuitive feeling explained that the says white person were to be interpreted as those found according common speech in amity with the understanding of the common man , and should be synonymous with the word meaning of Caucasian only as that...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .